Paper detail

Physical and Thermoelectric Properties of 2D B$_4$C Nanosheets

Boron carbide (B$_4$C) has been well studied both theoretically and experimentally in its bulk form due to its exceptional hardness and use as a high temperature thermoelectric. However, the properties of its two-dimensional nanosheets are not well established. In this paper, using van der Waals corrected density-functional theory (DFT) simulations, we show that the bulk B$_4$C can be cleaved along different directions to form B$_4$C nanosheets with low formation energies. We find that there is minimal dependence of the formation energies on the cleavage planes and surface terminations. Whilst the density of states of the bulk B$_4$C indicate that it is a semiconductor, the B$_4$C nanosheets are found to be predominantly metallic. We attribute this metallic behaviour to a redistribution of charges on the surface B-C bonds of the films. The Seebeck coefficients of the the B$_4$C films remain comparable to those of the bulk, and are nearly constant as a function of temperature. Our results provide guidance for experimental synthesis efforts and future application of B$_4$C nanosheets in nanoelectronic and thermoelectric applications.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.