Paper detail

Physical and Geometrical Parameters of CVBS XI: COU1511 (HIP12552)

Model atmospheres of the close visual binary star COU1511 (HIP12552) are constructed using grids of Kuruz's blanketed models to build the individual synthetic SEDs for both components. These synthetic SED's are combined together for the entire system and compared with the observational one following Al-Wardat's complex method for analyzing close visual binary stars. The entire observational spectral energy distribution (SED) of the system is used as a reference for comparison between synthetic SED and the observed one. The parameters of both components are derived as: $T_{\rm eff}^{a} =6180\pm50 $\,K, $T_{\rm eff}^{b} =5865\pm70$\,K, log $g_{a}=4.35\pm0.12$, log $g_{b}=4.45\pm0.14$, $R_{a}=1.262\pm0.08R_\odot$, $R_{b}=1.006\pm0.07R_\odot$, $L_a=2.09\pm0.10 L_\odot$, $L_b=1.08\pm0.12L_\odot$, with spectral types F8 and G1 for both components (a,b) respectively, and age of $3.0\pm 0.9$ Gy. A modified orbit of the system is built and the masses of the two components are calculated as $M_a=1.17\pm0.11M_\odot$, $M_b=1.06\pm0.10M_\odot$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.