Paper detail

Physical and Geometrical Parameters of CVBS X: The Spectroscopic Binary Gliese 762.1

We present the physical and geometrical parameters of the individual components of the close visual double-lined spectroscopic binary system Gliese 762.1, which were estimated using Al-Wardat's complex method for analyzing close visual binary systems. The estimated parameters of the individual components of the system are as follows: radius $R_{A}=0.845\pm0.09 R_\odot$, $R_{B}=0.795\pm0.10 R_\odot$, effective temperature $T_{\rm eff}^{A} =5300\pm50$\,K, $T_{\rm eff}^{B} =5150\pm50$\,K, surface gravity log $g_{A}=4.52\pm0.10$, log $g_{B}=4.54\pm0.15$ and luminosity $L_A=0.51\pm0.08 L_\odot$, $L_B=0.40\pm0.07L_\odot$. New orbital elements are presented with a semi-major axis of $0.0865 \pm 0.010 $ arcsec using the Hippracos parallax $π=58.96\pm0.65$ mas, and an accurate total mass and individual masses of the system are determined as $M=1.72\pm0.60M_\odot$, $M_A=0.89 \pm0.08M_\odot$ and $M_B=0.83 \pm0.07M_\odot$. Finally, the spectral types and luminosity classes of both components are assigned as K0V and K1.5V for the primary and secondary components respectively, and their positions on the H-R diagram and evolutionary tracks are given.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.