Paper detail

Physical and chemical modeling of the starless core L1512

The deuterium fractionation in starless cores gives us a clue to estimate their lifetime scales, thus allowing us to distinguish between different dynamical theories of core formation. Cores also seem to be subject to a differential N2 and CO depletion which was not expected from models. We aim to make a survey of 10 cores to estimate their lifetime scales and depletion profiles in detail. After L183, in Serpens, we present the second cloud of the series, L1512 in Auriga. To constrain the lifetime scale, we perform chemical modeling of the deuteration profiles across L1512 based on dust extinction measurements from near-infrared observations and non-local thermal equilibrium radiative transfer with multiple line observations of N2H+, N2D+, DCO+, C18O, and 13CO, plus H2D+ (1$_{10}$--1$_{11}$). We find a peak density of 1.1$\times$10$^5$ cm$^{-3}$ and a central temperature of 7.5$\pm$1 K, which are respectively higher and lower compared with previous dust emission studies. The depletion factors of N2H+ and N2D+ are 27$^{+17}_{-13}$ and 4$^{+2}_{-1}$ in L1512, intermediate between the two other more advanced and denser starless core cases, L183 and L1544. These factors also indicate a similar freeze-out of N2 in L1512, compared to the two others despite a peak density one to two orders of magnitude lower. Retrieving CO and N2 abundance profiles with the chemical model, we find that CO has a depletion factor of $\sim$430-870 and the N2 profile is similar to that of CO unlike towards L183. Therefore, L1512 has probably been living long enough so that N2 chemistry has reached steady state. N2H+ modeling remains compulsory to assess the precise physical conditions in the center of cold starless cores, rather than dust emission. L1512 is presumably older than 1.4 Myr. Therefore, the dominating core formation mechanism should be ambipolar diffusion for this source.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.