Paper detail

Photophoresis on particles hotter/colder than the ambient gas for the entire range of pressures

Small, illuminated aerosol particles embedded in a gas experience a photophoretic force. Most approximations assume the mean particle surface temperature to be effectively the gas temperature. This might not always be the case. If the particle temperature or the thermal radiation field strongly differs from the gas temperature (optically thin gases), given approximations for the free molecule regime overestimate the photophoretic force by an order of magnitude on average and for individual configurations up to three magnitudes. We apply the radiative equilibrium condition from the previous paper (Paper 1) -- where photophoresis in the free molecular flow regime was treated -- to the slip flow regime. The slip-flow model accounts for thermal creep, frictional and thermal stress gas slippage and temperature jump at the gas-particle interface. In the limiting case for vanishing Knudsen numbers -- the continuum limit -- our derived formula has a mean error of only 4 \% compared to numerical values. Eventually, we propose an equation for photophoretic forces for all Knudsen numbers following the basic idea from Rohatschek by interpolating between the free molecular flow and the continuum limit.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.