Paper detail

Photon Statistics Limits for Earth-Based Parallax Measurements of MACHO Events

We analyze the limitations imposed by photon counting statistics on extracting useful information about MACHOs from Earth-based parallax observations of microlensing events. We find that if one or more large (say $2.5\,\rm m$) telescopes are dedicated to observing a MACHO event for several nights near maximum amplification, then it is possible, in principle, to measure the velocity of the MACHO well enough to distinguish between disk and halo populations for events with $ω{A_m}\!^2 \gta 1\,\rm day^{-1}$, where $ω^{-1}$ denotes the timescale of the event and $A_m$ denotes its maximum amplification. Thus, if it turns out to be possible to reduce all other sources of error to below that of photon statistics, it may be feasible to do useful Earth-based parallax observations for high amplification events.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.