Photon-mediated charge-exchange reactions between 39K atoms and 40Ca+ ions in a hybrid trap

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Abstract

We present experimental evidence of charge exchange between laser-cooled potassium 39^{39}K atoms and calcium 40^{40}Ca+^+ ions in a hybrid atom-ion trap and give quantitative theoretical explanations for the observations. The 39^{39}K atoms and 40^{40}Ca+^+ ions are held in a magneto-optical (MOT) and a linear Paul trap, respectively. Fluorescence detection and high resolution time of flight mass spectra for both species are used to determine the remaining number of 40^{40}Ca+^+ ions, the increasing number of 39^{39}K+^+ ions, and 39^{39}K number density as functions of time. Simultaneous trap operation is guaranteed by alternating periods of MOT and 40^{40}Ca+^+ cooling lights, thus avoiding direct ionization of 39^{39}K by the 40^{40}Ca+^+ cooling light. We show that the K-Ca+^+ charge-exchange rate coefficient increases linearly from zero with 39^{39}K number density and, surprisingly, the fraction of 40^{40}Ca+^+ ions in the 4p\,2^2P1/2_{1/2} electronically-excited state. Combined with our theoretical analysis, we conclude that these data can only be explained by a process that starts with a potassium atom in its electronic ground state and a calcium ion in its excited 4p\,2^2P1/2_{1/2} state producing ground-state 39^{39}K+^+ ions and metastable, neutral Ca\,(3d4p3^3P1_1) atoms, releasing only 150 cm−1^{-1} equivalent relative kinetic energy. Charge-exchange between either ground- or excited-state 39^{39}K and ground-state 40^{40}Ca+^+ is negligibly small as no energetically-favorable product states are available. Our experimental and theoretical rate coefficients of 9×10−109\times10^{-10} cm3^3/s are in agreement given the uncertainty budgets.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.