Paper detail

Photon counting spectroscopic CT with dynamic beam attenuator

Purpose: Photon counting (PC) computed tomography (CT) can provide material selective CT imaging at lowest patient dose but it suffers from suboptimal count rate. A dynamic beam attenuator (DBA) can help with count rate by modulating x-ray beam intensity such that the low attenuating areas of the patient receive lower exposure, and detector behind these areas is not overexposed. However, DBA may harden the beam and cause artifacts and errors. This work investigates positive and negative effects of using DBA in PCCT. Methods: A simple PCCT with single energy bin, spectroscopic PCCT with 2 and 5 energy bins, and conventional energy integrating CT with and without DBA were simulated and investigated using 120kVp tube voltage and 14mGy air dose. The DBAs were modeled as made from soft tissue (ST) equivalent material, iron (Fe), and holmium (Ho) K-edge material. A cylindrical CT phantom and chest phantom with iodine and CaCO3 contrast elements were used. Image artifacts and quantification errors in general and material decomposed CT were determined. Results: Simple PCCT exhibited major image artifacts and quantification errors when DBAs were used. The artifacts and errors were decreased with 2bin spectroscopic PCCT and nearly eliminated with 5bin spectroscopic CT. The photon starvation noise did present with Fe-DBA due to strong absorption of lower energy photons. The 5bin PCCT with ST-DBA and Ho-DBA were nearly free of artifacts and photon starvation noise. The Ho-DBA better preserved low energy photons and decreased beam hardening artifacts, and improved material decomposition. Also, the Ho-DBA was also miniature having 1.4mm thickness and 2cm length, much smaller than Fe-DBA. Conclusion: DBA fabricated from K-edge material such as Ho can address count rate problem of PCCT and provide miniature size, minimal image artifacts, and improved material decomposition at lowest patient dose.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.