Paper detail

Photometric Selection of z~5 Lyman Break Galaxies in the ESO Remote Galaxy Survey

We describe the selection of a sample of photometrically-defined Lyman break galaxies (LBGs) at z~5 using the multi-wavelength imaging data of the ESO Remote Galaxy Survey (ERGS). The data is drawn from ten widely-separated fields covering a total sky area of 275 arcmin squared. Starting with a simple colour (R-I>1.3) and magnitude (I<26.3) cut to isolate the Lyman break and then refining the sample by applying further optical and near-infrared photometric criteria we identify a sample of 253 LBG candidates. We carefully model the completeness of this sample and the factors that affect its reliability. There is considerable overlap between this sample and a spectroscopically-confirmed sample drawn from the same survey and this allows us to determine the reliability of the optical photometric selection (~60 per cent) and to show that the reliability can be significantly improved (to ~80 per cent) by applying near-infrared waveband criteria to exclude very red contaminants. Even this high level of reliability may compromise some statistical studies of LBG properties. We show that over 30 per cent of the highest reliability candidates have multiple UV-luminous components and/or disturbed morphology in HST imaging, though it is unclear whether this represents multiple interacting/merging sources or individual large sources with multiple UV bright regions. Using this sample we confirm that the normalisation of the bright end of the z=5 UV luminosity function (down to M*) is lower than the same at z=4 by a factor of 3. Using a Schechter fit we determine M*uv=-20.9+/-0.2. We discuss whether it is reasonable to expect the UV luminosity function to follow a Schechter function, given the UV emission is short-lived and stochastic, and does not necessarily trace the underlying mass of the galaxy.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.