Paper detail

Photometric Redshifts in the Hawaii-Hubble Deep Field-North (H-HDF-N)

We derive photometric redshifts (\zp) for sources in the entire ($\sim0.4$ deg$^2$) Hawaii-Hubble Deep Field-North (\hdfn) field with the EAzY code, based on point spread function-matched photometry of 15 broad bands from the ultraviolet (\bandu~band) to mid-infrared (IRAC 4.5 $μ$m). Our catalog consists of a total of 131,678 sources. We evaluate the \zp~quality by comparing \zp~with spectroscopic redshifts (\zs) when available, and find a value of normalized median absolute deviation \sigm$=$0.029 and an outlier fraction of 5.5\% (outliers are defined as sources having $\rm |\zp - \zs|/(1+\zs) > 0.15$) for non-X-ray sources. More specifically, we obtain \sigm$=0.024$ with 2.7\% outliers for sources brighter than $R=23$~mag, \sigm$=0.035$ with 7.4\% outliers for sources fainter than $R=23$~mag, \sigm$=$0.026 with 3.9\% outliers for sources having $z<1$, and \sigm$=$0.034 with 9.0\% outliers for sources having $z>1$. Our \zp\ quality shows an overall improvement over an earlier \zp\ work that focused only on the central \hdfn\ area. We also classify each object as star or galaxy through template spectral energy distribution fitting and complementary morphological parametrization, resulting in 4959 stars and 126,719 galaxies. Furthermore, we match our catalog with the 2~Ms {\it Chandra} Deep Field-North main \xray~catalog. For the 462 matched non-stellar \xray~sources (281 having \zs), we improve their \zp~quality by adding three additional AGN templates, achieving \sigm$=0.035$ and an outlier fraction of 12.5\%. We make our catalog publicly available presenting both photometry and \zp, and provide guidance on how to make use of our catalog.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access14 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.