Paper detail

Photometric redshifts for the CFHTLS T0004 Deep and Wide fields

We compute photometric redshifts based on the template-fitting method in the fourth public release of the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey. This unique multi-colour catalogue comprises u*,g&#39;,r&#39;,i&#39;,z&#39; photometry in four deep fields of 1 deg2 each and 35 deg2 distributed over three Wide fields. Our photometric redshifts are calibrated with and compared to 16,983 high-quality spectroscopic redshifts from several surveys. We find a dispersion of 0.028 and an outlier rate of 3.5% in the Deep field at i&#39;AB < 24 and a dispersion of 0.036 and an outlier rate of 2.8% in the Wide field at i&#39;AB < 22.5. Beyond i&#39;AB = 22.5 in the Wide field the number of outliers rises from 5% to 10% at i&#39;AB<23 and i&#39;AB<24 respectively. For the Wide sample, we find the systematic redshift bias keeps below 1% to i&#39;AB < 22.5, whereas we find no significant bias in the Deep field. We investigated the effect of tile-to-tile photometric variations and demonstrate that the accuracy of our photometric redshifts is reduced by at most 21%. We separate stars from galaxies using both the size and colour information, reducing the contamination by stars in our catalogues from 50% to 8% at i&#39;AB < 22.5 in fields with the highest stellar density while keeping a complete galaxy sample. Our CFHTLS T0004 photometric redshifts are distributed to the community. Our release include 592,891 (i&#39;AB < 22.5) and 244,701 (i&#39;AB < 24) reliable galaxy photometric redshifts in the Wide and Deep fields, respectively.

preprint2008arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.