Paper detail

Photometric redshifts: estimating their contamination and distribution using clustering information

We present a new technique to estimate the level of contamination between photometric redshift bins. If the true angular cross-correlation between redshift bins can be safely assumed to be zero, any measured cross-correlation is a result of contamination between the bins. We present the theory for an arbitrary number of redshift bins, and discuss in detail the case of two and three bins which can be easily solved analytically. We use mock catalogues constructed from the Millennium Simulation to test the method, showing that artificial contamination can be successfully recovered with our method. We find that degeneracies in the parameter space prohibit us from determining a unique solution for the contamination, though constraints are made which can be improved with larger data sets. We then apply the method to an observational galaxy survey: the deep component of the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope Legacy Survey. We estimate the level of contamination between photometric redshift bins and demonstrate our ability to reconstruct both the true redshift distribution and the true average redshift of galaxies in each photometric bin.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.