Paper detail

Photometric Observations of an SU UMa-type Dwarf Nova VW Coronae Borealis during Outbursts

We report the photometric observations of an SU UMa-type dwarf nova VW CrB during two superoutbursts in 2001 and 2003 and a normal outburst in 2003. Superhumps with a period of 0.07287(1) d were observed during the 2003 superoutburst. The change rate of the superhump period was positive. During the normal outburst, there are some hint of modulation up to a 0.2-mag amplitude. However, any periodicity was not found. The recurrence cycles of the normal outburst and the superoutburst, and the distance were estimated to be > ~50 d, 270-500 d, and 690(+230, -170) pc, respectively. These recurrence cycles are usual values for an SU UMa-type dwarf nova having this superhump period. The superhump period of VW CrB was the longest among those of the SU UMa stars with positive derivatives of the superhump period. The coverage of our observations was, however, not enough, and the variation of the Psh change rate of VW CrB is still unknown. A superhump regrowth and a brightening were seen near the end of the plateau phase. Measuring the deviation of the start timings of the brightening and the superhump regrowth (>2 days in VW CrB) will be a key to reveal the mechanism of these phenomena.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.