Paper detail

Photometric observation of transiting extrasolar planet WASP - 10b

Wasp-10b is a very interesting transiting extrasolar planet. Although its transit is very deep, about 40 mmag, there are very different estimates of its radius in the literature. We present new photometric observations of four complete transits of this planet. The whole event was detected for each transit and the final light curve consists of more than 1500 individual CCD exposures. We determine the following system parameters: planet to star radius ratio R_p/R_star=0.168 +- 0.001, star radius to semimajor axis ratio R_star/a = 0.094 +- 0.001 and inclination i=87.3 +- 0.1 deg. Assuming that the semimajor axis is 0.036 9 +- ^{0.0012}_{0.0014} AU (Christian et al. 2009), we obtain the following radius of the planet R_p=1.22 +- 0.05 R_J, and radius of the star R_star = 0.75 +- 0.03. The errors include the uncertainty in the stellar mass and the semimajor axis of the planet. Surprisingly, our estimate of the planet radius is significantly higher (by about 12 percent) than the most recent value of Johnson et al. (2009). We also improve the orbital period P_orb=3.092 731 +- 1x10^{-6} days and estimate the average transit duration T_D=0.097 4 +- 8x10^{-4} days.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.