Paper detail

Photometric mass and mass decomposition in early-type lens galaxies

By using the SDSS multicolor photometry and lens modeling, we study stellar mass properties and the luminous and dark matter composition of the 57 early-type lens galaxies analyzed by the SLACS Survey. We fit the lens SEDs composed of ugriz magnitudes with a three-parameter grid of different composite stellar population models, computed by adopting solar metallicity and various IMFs, and we employ the best-fit values of the total projected mass enclosed within the Einstein ring of each system. We measure size-stellar mass and surface stellar mass density-stellar mass relations consistent with those determined for non-lens galaxies. We find statistically significant evidence that more massive lens galaxies tend to form in regions of higher galaxy density, as for all early-type galaxies. We measure for the corresponding stellar quantities the same scaling law between effective mass-to-light ratio and mass, that is used to explain the "tilt" of the FP, and the same evolution of the effective mass-to-light ratio with redshift, that can be derived from the FP. We conclude that the lens total mass is linearly proportional to the luminous mass, at a more than 99% CL. In addition, by assuming that the lens galaxies are homologous systems, we study their distribution of dark matter and estimate a value on the order of 30% for the dark over total projected mass fraction contained within the average Einstein radius of approximately 4 kpc. These results suggest that early-type lens galaxies are an unbiased subsample representative of the whole sample of early-type galaxies. This allows us to generalize our findings on dark matter in lens galaxies to the population of massive early-type galaxies. We note that, for the assumed metallicity, a Salpeter IMF describes well the lens sample.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.