Paper detail

Photoexcited Carriers Recombination And Trapping In Spherical Vs Faceted TiO2 Nanoparticles

Nanoparticles of very small size (below 10 nm) of TiO2 material are nowadays the functional building blocks of many developing technological applications. Nano is clearly different from bulk or extended systems as regards surface area, molecular binding properties, charge separation efficiency, electron/hole transport, photochemical conversion properties, etc. In this work, we investigate the life path of energy (excitons) and charge (electrons and holes) carriers in anatase TiO2 nanoparticles of different size (2-3 nm) and shape (faceted vs spherical), by means of a wide set of hybrid density functional theory calculations. The attention is focused on the exciton/charge carriers formation, separation, recombination, self-trapping processes, which are analyzed in terms of structural deformations, energy gain or cost, charge localization/delocalization and electronic transitions involved. The computational models are corroborated by an extensive comparison with available experimental data based on photoluminescence measurements, electron paramagnetic resonance and transient absorption spectroscopies. Peculiar differences are observed for spherical nanoparticles with respect to faceted ones because of the higher disorder and larger diversity of coordination sites present on the surface. For example, charge delocalization on several lattice sites is more competitive with self-trapping processes in faceted than in spherical nanoparticles. This relates to the fact that selective compression or elongation of Ti-O bonds play a key role in determining the effectiveness of trapping sites, with spherical nanoparticles being more flexible. Moreover, hydroxyl groups on surface five-fold coordinated Ti sites are also found to be good hole trapping sites.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.