Paper detail

Photodynamical Modeling of the Fascinating Eclipses in the Triple-Star System KOI-126

We explore the fascinating eclipses and dynamics of the compact hierarchical triple star system KOI-126 (KIC 5897826). This system is comprised of a pair of M-dwarf stars (KOI-126 B and C) in a 1.74 day orbit which revolve around an F-star (KOI-126 A) every 34 days. Complex eclipse shapes are created as the M stars transit the F star, due to two effects: (i) the duration of the eclipse is a significant fraction of the M-star orbital period, so the prograde or retrograde motion of the M stars in their orbit lead to unusually short or long duration eclipses; (ii) due to 3-body dynamics, the M-star orbit precesses with an astonishingly quick timescale of 1.74 years for the periastron (apsidal) precession, and 2.73 years for the inclination and nodal angle precession. Using the full Kepler data set, supplemented with ground-based photometry, plus 29 radial velocity measurements that span 6 years, our photodynamical modeling yields masses of $M_{A} = 1.2713 \pm 0.0047 M_{\odot}$ (0.37%), $M_{B} = 0.23529 \pm 0.00062 M_{\odot}$ (0.26%), and $M_{C} = 0.20739 \pm 0.00055 M_{\odot}$ (0.27%) and radii of $R_{A} = 1.9984 \pm 0.0027 R_{\odot}$ (0.14%), $R_{B}= 0.25504 \pm 0.00076 R_{\odot}$ (0.3%), and $R_{C} = 0.23196 \pm 0.00069 R_{\odot}$ (0.3%). We also estimate the apsidal motion constant of the M-dwarfs, a parameter that characterizes the internal mass distribution. While not particularly precise, we measure a mean apsidal motion constant, $\overline{k_{2}}$, of $ 0.046^{+0.046}_{-0.028}$, which is approximately 2-$σ$ lower than the theoretical model prediction of 0.150. We explore possible causes for this discrepancy.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.