Paper detail

Photo-z Quality Cuts and their Effect on the Measured Galaxy Clustering

Photometric galaxy surveys are an essential tool to further our understanding of the large-scale structure of the universe, its matter and energy content and its evolution. These surveys necessitate the determination of the galaxy redshifts using photometric techniques (photo-z). Oftentimes, it is advantageous to remove from the galaxy sample those for which one suspects that the photo-z estimation might be unreliable. In this paper, we show that applying these photo-z quality cuts blindly can grossly bias the measured galaxy correlations within and across photometric redshift bins. We then extend the work of Ho et al. (2012) and Ross et al. (2011) to develop a simple and effective method to correct for this using the data themselves. Finally, we apply the method to the Mega-Z catalog, containing about a million luminous red galaxies in the redshift range 0.45 < z < 0.65. After splitting the sample into four Δz = 0.05 photo-z bins using the BPZ algorithm, we see how our corrections bring the measured galaxy auto- and cross-correlations into agreement with expectations. We then look for the BAO feature in the four bins, with and without applying the photo-z quality cuts, and find a broad agreement between the BAO scales extracted in both cases. Intriguingly, we observe a correlation between galaxy density and photo-z quality even before any photo-z quality cuts are applied. This may be due to uncorrected observational effects that result in correlated gradients across the sky of the galaxy density and the galaxy photo-z precision. Our correction procedure could also help to mitigate some of these systematic effects.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.