Paper detail

Phenotypic Trait of Particle Geometries

People of a race appear different but share a 'phenotypic trait' due to a common genetic origin. Mineral particles are like humans: they appear different despite having a same geological origin. Then, do the particles have some sort of 'phenotypic trait' in the geometries as we do? How can we characterize the phenotypic trait of particle geometries? This paper discusses a new perspective on how the phenotypic trait can be discovered in the particle geometries and how the 'variation' and 'average' of the geometry can be quantified. The key idea is using the power-law between particle surface-area-to-volume ratio ($A/V$) and the particle volume ($V$) that uncovers the phenotypic trait in terms of $α$ and $β^*$: From the log-transformed relation of $V = (A/V)^α {\times} β^*$, the power value $α$ represents the relation between shape and size, while the term $β^*$ (evaluated by fixing $α$ = -3) informs the angularity of the average shape in the granular material. In other words, $α$ represents the 'variation' of the geometry while $β^*$ is concerned with the 'average' geometry of a granular material. Furthermore, this study finds that $A/V$ and $V$ can be also used to characterize individual particle shape in terms of Wadell's true Sphericity ($S$). This paper also revisits the $M = A/V {\times} L/6$ concept originally introduced by Su et al. (2020) and finds the shape index $M$ is an extended form of $S$ providing additional information about the particle elongation. Therefore, the proposed method using $A/V$ and $V$ provides a unified approach that can characterize the particle geometry at multiple scales from granular material to a single particle. Ref.: Su, Y.F., Bhattacharya, S., Lee, S.J., Lee, C.H., Shin, M.: A new interpretation of three-dimensional particle geometry: M-A-V-L. Transp. Geotech. 23, 100328 (2020).

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.