Paper detail

Phenomenology of supersymmetric neutrino mass models

The origin of neutrino masses is currently one of the most intriguing questions of particle physics and many extensions of the Standard Model have been proposed in that direction. This experimental evidence is a very robust indication of new physics, but is not the only reason to go beyond the Standard Model. The existence of some theoretical issues supports the idea of a wider framework, supersymmetry being the most popular one. In this thesis, several supersymmetric neutrino mass models have been studied. In the first part, the phenomenology of models with bilinear-like R-parity violation is discussed in great detail, highlighting the most distinctive signatures at colliders and low energy experiments. In particular, the correlations between the LSP decay and neutrino physics are shown to be a powerful tool to put this family of models under experimental test. Other important signatures are investigated as well, like majoron emission in charged lepton decays for the case of models with spontaneous breaking of R-parity. A very different approach is followed in the second part of the thesis. Supersymmetric models with a Left-Right symmetry have all the ingredients to incorporate a type-I seesaw mechanism for neutrino masses and conserve R-parity at low energies. In this case, which only allows for indirect tests, the generation of neutrino masses at the high seesaw scale is encoded at low energies in the slepton soft masses. Contrary to minimal seesaw models, sizeable flavor violation in the right slepton sector is expected. Its experimental observation would be a clear hint of an underlying Left-Right symmetry, providing valuable information about physics at very high energies.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.