Paper detail

Phenomenology of pseudotensor mesons and the pseudotensor glueball

We study the decays of the pseudotensor mesons $[ π_{2}(1670) , K_{2}(1770) , η_{2}(1645) , η_{2}(1870) ]$ interpreted as the ground-state nonet of $1^1 D_{2}$ $\bar{q}q$ states using interaction Lagrangians which couple them to pseudoscalar, vector, and tensor mesons. While the decays of $π_2 (1670)$ and $K_2 (1770)$ can be well described, the decays of the isoscalar states $η_2 (1645)$ and $η_2 (1870)$ can be brought in agreement with experimental data only if the mixing angle between nonstrange and strange states is surprisingly large (about $-42^\circ$, similar to the mixing in the pseudoscalar sector, in which the chiral anomaly is active). Such a large mixing angle is however at odd with all other conventional quark-antiquark nonets: if confirmed, a deeper study of its origin will be needed in the future. Moreover, the $\bar{q}q$ assignment of pseudotensor states predicts that the ratio $[ η_2 (1870) \rightarrow a_2 (1320) π]/[η_2 (1870) \rightarrow f_2 (1270) η]$ is about $23.5$. This value is in agreement with Barberis et al., ($20.4 \pm 6.6$), but disagrees with the recent reanalysis of Anisovich et al., ($1.7 \pm 0.4$). Future experimental studies are necessary to understand this puzzle. If Anisovich's value shall be confirmed, a simple nonet of pseudoscalar mesons cannot be able to describe data (different assignments and/or additional state, such as an hybrid state, will be needed). In the end, we also evaluate the decays of a pseudoscalar glueball into the aforementioned conventional $\bar{q}q$ states: a sizable decay into $K^\ast_2 (1430) K$ and $a_2 (1230) π$ together with a vanishing decay into pseudoscalar-vector pairs [such as $ρ(770) π$ and $K^\ast (892) K$] are expected. This information can be helpful in future studies of glueballs at the ongoing BESIII and at the future PANDA experiments.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.