Paper detail

Phenomenology of $ϕ$ photoproduction from recent CLAS data at Jefferson Lab

We comment on the important phenomenological aspects of the recent high-statistics and wide-angle coverage $ϕ$ photoproduction data from CLAS at Jefferson Lab. The most prominent feature is a localized structure at a center-of-mass (c.m) energy $\sqrt{s} \sim 2.2$ GeV that is not expected in a simple $t$-channel Pomeron-exchange model. The structure exists only at the forward production angles that almost rules out any resonance contribution. Strong rescattering effects between the $p ϕ$ and $K^+Λ(1520)$ channels could be possible explanations. The analyses of both charged- ($ϕ\to K^+ K^-$) and neutral- ($ϕ\to K^0_S K^0_L$) $K\bar{K}$ decay modes of the $ϕ$, that show some minor differences, can be illuminating in this respect. We also comment on the angular structure of the Pomeron-parton coupling as borne out in the polarization data where the often-asumed $s$-channel helicity conservation is seen to be broken.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.