Paper detail

Phenomenological model explaining Hubble Tension origin

One of the problem revealed recently in cosmology is a so-called Hubble tension (HT), which is the difference between values of the present Hubble constant, measured by observation of the universe at redshift $z \lesssim 1$, and by observations of a distant universe with CMB fluctuations originated at $z \sim 1100$. In this paper we suggest, that this discrepancy may be explained by deviation of the cosmological expansion from a standard Lambda-CDM %simple Friedman model of a flat universe, during the period after recombination at $z \lesssim 1100$, due to action of additional variable component of a dark energy of different origin.. We suppose, that a dark matter (DM) has a common origin with a variable component of a dark energy (DEV). DE presently may have two components, one of which is the Einstein constant $Λ$, and another, smaller component DEV ($Λ_V$) comes from the remnants of a scalar fields responsible for inflation. Due to common origin and interconnections the densities of DEV and DM are supposed to be connected, and remain almost constant during, at least, the time after recombination, when we may approximate $ρ_{DM}=αρ_{DEV}$. This part of the dark energy in not connected with the cosmological constant $Λ$, but is defined by existence of scalar fields with a variable density. Taking into account the influence of DEV on the universe expansion we find the value of $α$ which could remove the HT problem. In order to maintain the almost constant DEV/DM energy density ratio during the time interval at $z<1100$, we suggest an existence of a wide mass DM particle distribution.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.