Paper detail

Phenomenological aspects of supergravity theories in de Sitter vacua

We introduce an $N=1$ supergravity model based on the gauged shift symmetry of a single chiral multiplet, which can be identified with the string dilaton or a compactification modulus. The model allows for a tunably small and positive value of the cosmological constant. The gravitino mass parameter and the dilaton Vacuum Expectation Value are separately tunable. In a second part we analyze the quantum consistency of these models. Recent work on anomalies in supergravity theories with Fayet-Iliopoulos terms was extended, such that their results can be interpreted from a field-theoretic point of view. We show that for certain values of the parameters the anomaly cancellation conditions are inconsistent with a TeV gravitino mass. In the third part the above model is used as a hidden sector for supersymmetry breaking. In its minimal version, the model leads to tachyonic scalar soft masses. This problem can however be circumvented by the introduction of an extra Polónyi-like hidden sector field, or by allowing for non-canonical kinetic terms for the Standard Model fields, while maintaining the desirable features of the model. The resulting low energy spectrum consists of very light neutralinos, charginos and gluinos, while the squarks remain heavy, with the exception of the stop squark which can be as light as 2 TeV. Finally, we discus possibility that the shift symmetry is identified with known global symmetries of the MSSM. The particular cases where this global symmetry is Baryon minus Lepton number ($B-L$), or $3B-L$, which contain the known R-parity or matter parity of the MSSM, are analyzed in great detail. It is shown that the phenomenology is similar to the above case where the MSSM fields are inert, with the exception of the stop squark, which can be as light as $1.5$ TeV.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.