Paper detail

Phase transitions in growing groups: How cohesion can persist

The cohesion of a social group is the group's tendency to remain united. It has important implications for the stability and survival of social organizations, such as political parties, research teams, or online groups. Empirical studies suggest that cohesion is affected by both the admission process of new members and the group size. Yet, a theoretical understanding of their interplay is still lacking. To this end, we propose a model where a group grows by a noisy admission process of new members who can be of two different types. Cohesion is defined in this framework as the fraction of members of the same type and the noise in the admission process represents the level of randomness in the evaluation of new candidates. The model can reproduce the empirically reported decrease of cohesion with the group size. When the admission of new candidates involves the decision of only one group member, the group growth causes a loss of cohesion even for infinitesimal levels of noise. However, when admissions require a consensus of several group members, there is a critical noise level below which the growing group remains cohesive. The nature of the transition between the cohesive and non-cohesive phases depends on the model parameters and forms a rich structure reminiscent of critical phenomena in ferromagnetic materials.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.