Paper detail

Phase Space Models of the Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies

This paper introduces new phase-space models of dwarf spheroidal galaxies (dSphs). The stellar component has an isotropic, lowered isothermal (or King) distribution function. A physical basis for the isotropization of stellar velocities is given by tidal stirring, whilst the isothermality of the distribution function guarantees the observed flatness of the velocity dispersion profile in the inner parts. Our models reproduce the data on the half-light radius and line of sight central velocity dispersion of the dSphs. We show that different dark halo profiles -- whether cored or cusped -- lead to very similar mass estimates within one particular radius, namely 1.7 half-light radii. Deviations between mass measures due to different density profiles are substantially smaller than the uncertainties propagated by the observational errors. We produce a mass measure for each of the Milky Way dSphs and find that the two most massive are the most luminous, namely Sagittarius (~ 2.8 x 10^8 solar masses) and Fornax (~ 1.3 x 10^8 solar masses). The least massive of the Milky Way satellites are Willman 1 (~ 4 x 10^5 solar masses) and Segue 1 (~ 6 x 10^5 solar masses).

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.