Paper detail

Phase Space Correspondence between Classical Optics and Quantum Mechanics

The paper scrutinizes both the similarities and the differences between the classical optics and quantum mechanical theories in phase space, especially between the Wigner distribution functions defined in the respective phase spaces. Classical optics is able to provide an understanding of either the corpuscular or wave aspects of quantum mechanics, reflected in phase space through the classical limit of the quantum Wigner distribution function or the Wigner distribution function in classical optics, respectively. However, classical optics, as any classical theory, cannot mimic the wave-particle duality that is at the heart of quantum mechanics. Moreover, it is never enough underlined that, although the mathematical phase space formalisms in classical optics and quantum mechanics are very similar, the main difference between these theories, evidenced in the results of measurements, is as deep as it can get even in phase space. On the other hand, the phase space treatment allows an unexpected similar treatment of interference phenomena, although quantum and classical superpositions of wavefunctions and fields, respectively, have a completely different behavior. This similarity originates in the bilinear character of the Wigner distribution function in both quantum mechanics and classical optical wave theory. Actually, the phase space treatment of the quantum and classical wave theory is identical from the mathematical point of view, if the Planck constant is replaced by the wavelength of light. Even Wigner distribution functions of particular quantum states, such as the Schrodinger cat state, can be mimicked by classical optical means, but not the true quantum character, which resides in the probability significance of the wavefunction, in comparison to the physical realness of classical wave fields.

preprint2004arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.