Paper detail

Phase Retrieval: Stability and Recovery Guarantees

We consider stability and uniqueness in real phase retrieval problems over general input sets. Specifically, we assume the data consists of noisy quadratic measurements of an unknown input x in R^n that lies in a general set T and study conditions under which x can be stably recovered from the measurements. In the noise-free setting we derive a general expression on the number of measurements needed to ensure that a unique solution can be found in a stable way, that depends on the set T through a natural complexity parameter. This parameter can be computed explicitly for many sets T of interest. For example, for k-sparse inputs we show that O(k\log(n/k)) measurements are needed, and when x can be any vector in R^n, O(n) measurements suffice. In the noisy case, we show that if one can find a value for which the empirical risk is bounded by a given, computable constant (that depends on the set T), then the error with respect to the true input is bounded above by an another, closely related complexity parameter of the set. By choosing an appropriate number N of measurements, this bound can be made arbitrarily small, and it decays at a rate faster than N^{-1/2+δ} for any δ>0. In particular, for k-sparse vectors stable recovery is possible from O(k\log(n/k)\log k) noisy measurements, and when x can be any vector in R^n, O(n \log n) noisy measurements suffice. We also show that the complexity parameter for the quadratic problem is the same as the one used for analyzing stability in linear measurements under very general conditions. Thus, no substantial price has to be paid in terms of stability if there is no knowledge of the phase.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.