Paper detail

Phase-map synthesis from magnitude-only MR images using conditional score-based diffusion models with application in training of accelerated MRI reconstruction models

Accelerated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enabled by the training of deep learning (DL)-based image recon. models requires large and diverse raw k-space datasets. In most clinical MRI applications, due to storage and patient privacy concerns, raw k-space data is discarded and magnitude-only images are the only component saved. Consequently, a large portion of the DL-based MRI recon. literature has either relied on small training datasets or has used one of the few available open-source k-space datasets. At the same time, the growing number of anonymized magnitude-only image registries/databases motivates the development of techniques that can use them as training datasets for generalizable DL-based recon. models. Here we propose to address this challenge by employing a generative approach based on conditional score-based diffusion models (SBDMs): given a magnitude-only MR image, it synthesizes a phase map (in the image domain) that realistically corresponds to the magnitude-only image. We evaluate its generative capabilities in a downstream DL-based recon. task whereby a large k-space dataset is generated by combining the SBDM-synthesized phase-maps and the corresponding magnitude-only images, and this k-space dataset is then used to train a DL model for accelerated MRI recon. We compare the performance of the resulting DL model versus those trained according to (a) a naive approach that uses smooth phase, (b) a k-space training dataset generated using synthesized phase maps derived from a generative adversarial network, and (c) the ground truth k-space data. Our results suggest that the DL model trained from SBDM-synthesized k-space data outperforms the other approaches in terms of quantitative metrics as well as qualitatively observed recon. fidelity, i.e., whether the reconstructed images include erroneous or hallucinated features that could adversely impact diagnostic accuracy.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.