Paper detail

Phase-Field Modeling of Coupled Brittle-Ductile Fracture in Aluminum Alloys

Fracture in aluminum alloys with precipitates involves at least two mechanisms, namely, ductile fracture of the aluminum-rich matrix and brittle fracture of the precipitates. In this work, a coupled crystal plasticity-phase field model for mixed ductile-brittle failure modes is formulated and used to investigate the effect of precipitate morphology and size distribution on damage evolution in aluminum alloys. A thermodynamically consistent framework for elastic and plastic work dissipation in the fracture process zone is used to formulate the coupled constitutive behavior for brittle and ductile damage, respectively. Representative Volume Elements (RVE) with varying particle morphology and orientation were generated and their uni-axial loading was simulated to assess the damage resistance of the different model microstructures. For critical energy release rate $G_c$ values of the aluminum matrix ranging from 4 to 8~Jm$^{-2}$ for single crystals and from 10 to 16~Jm$^{-2}$ for polycrystals, the model predicts a change in failure modes from particle debonding to cracking followed by ductile matrix failure. The change of particle failure mechanism as a result of increased $G_c$ is observed for both, single and polycrystalline model microstructures. For the case of particle debonding, microstructures with circular or ellipsoidal particles (with the major axis perpendicular to the loading direction) show a higher ductility and fracture work compared to the other studied cases. In the case of particle cracking, microstructures with ellipsoidal particles aligned parallel to the loading axis show a higher ductility and fracture work among the investigated cases. The simulations qualitatively reproduce the experimentally observed particle failure mechanisms (cracking and debonding) for two different matrix alloy classes (commercially pure and 2xxx alloys) reinforced with ceramic particles.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.