Paper detail

Phase boundaries in deterministic dense coding

We consider dense coding with partially entangled states on bipartite systems of dimension $d\times d$, studying the conditions under which a given number of messages, $N$, can be deterministically transmitted. It is known that the largest Schmidt coefficient, $λ_0$, must obey the bound $λ_0\le d/N$, and considerable empirical evidence points to the conclusion that there exist states satisfying $λ_0=d/N$ for every $d$ and $N$ except the special cases $N=d+1$ and $N=d^2-1$. We provide additional conditions under which this bound cannot be reached -- that is, when it must be that $λ_0<d/N$ -- yielding insight into the shapes of boundaries separating entangled states that allow $N$ messages from those that allow only $N-1$. We also show that these conclusions hold no matter what operations are used for the encoding, and in so doing, identify circumstances under which unitary encoding is strictly better than non-unitary.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.