Paper detail

Perturbative stability of the QCD predictions for the ratio $R=F_L/F_T$ and azimuthal asymmetry in heavy-quark leptoproduction

We analyze the perturbative and parametric stability of the QCD predictions for the Callan-Gross ratio $R(x,Q^2)=F_L/F_T$ and azimuthal $\cos(2φ)$ asymmetry in heavy-quark leptoproduction. Our analysis shows that large radiative corrections to the structure functions cancel each other in their ratio $R(x,Q^2)$ and azimuthal asymmetry with good accuracy. As a result, the NLO contributions to the Callan-Gross ratio and $\cos(2φ)$ asymmetry are less than 10% in a wide region of the variables $x$ and $Q^2$. We provide compact analytic predictions for $R(x,Q^2)$ and asymmetry in the case of low $x\ll 1$. Simple formulae connecting the high-energy behavior of the Callan-Gross ratio and azimuthal asymmetry with the low-$x$ asymptotics of the gluon density in the target are derived. It is shown that the obtained hadron-level predictions for $R(x,Q^2)$ and azimuthal asymmetry are stable at $x\ll 1$ under the DGLAP evolution of the gluon distribution function. Concerning the experimental aspects, we propose to exploit the observed perturbative stability of the Callan-Gross ratio and $\cos(2φ)$ asymmetry in the extraction of the structure functions from the corresponding reduced cross sections. In particular, our obtained analytic expressions simplify essentially the determination of $F_2^c(x,Q^2)$ and $F_2^b(x,Q^2)$ from available data of the H1 Collaboration. Our results will also be useful in extraction of the azimuthal asymmetries from the incoming and future data on heavy-quark leptoproduction.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.