Paper detail

Perturbative QCD for B_s \to a_1(1260)(b_1(1235))P(V) Decays

Within the framework of perturbative QCD approach, we study the charmless two-body decays $B_s \to a_1(1260)(b_1(1235))P(V)$ ($P, V$ represent the light pseudo-scalar and vector mesons, respectively.). Using the decays constants and the light-cone distribution amplitudes for these mesons derived from the QCD sum rule method, we find the following results: (a) The decays $\bar B^0_s\to a^{-}_1K^{+}(K^{*+})$ have the contributions from the factorization emission diagrams with a large Wilson coefficient $C_2+C_1/3$ (order of 1), so they have the largest branching ratios and arrive at $10^{-5}$ order. While for the decays $\bar B^0_s\to a^{0}_1 K^{0}(K^{*0})$, the Wilson coefficient is $C_1+C_2/3$ in tree level and color suppressed, so their branching ratios are small and fall in the order of $10^{-7}\sim10^{-8}$. For the decays $\bar B^0_s\to b_1K(K^*)$, all of their branching ratios are of order few times $10^{-6}$. (b) For the pure annihilation type decays $\bar B^0_s\to a_1(b_1)ρ$ except the decays $\bar B^0_s\to a_1π$ having large branching ratios of order few times $10^{-6}$, the most other decays have the branching ratios of $10^{-7}$ order. The branching ratios of the decays $\bar B^0_s\to a^0_1(b^0_1)ω$ are the smallest and fall in the order of $10^{-8}\sim10^{-9}$. (c)The branching ratios and the direct CP-asymmetries of decays $\bar B^0_s\to a^0_1(b_1^0)η^{(\prime)}$ are very sensitive to take different Gegenbauer moments for $η^{(\prime)}$. (d) Except for the decays $\bar B^0_s\to a^{0}_1 K^{*0}, a^{0}_1ω, b^{0}_1ω$, the longitudinal polarization fractions of other $\bar B^0_s\to a_1(b_1)V$ decays are very large and more than 90%. (e) Compared with decays $\bar B^0_s\to a_1(b_1)P$, most of $\bar B^0_s\to a_1(b_1)V$ decays have smaller direct CP asymmetries.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.