Paper detail

Perturbations and Linearization Stability of Closed Friedmann Universes

We consider perturbations of closed Friedmann universes. Perturbation modes of two lowest wavenumbers ($L=0$ and $1$) are generally known to be fictitious, but here we show that both are physical. The issue is more subtle in Einstein static universes where closed background space has a time-like Killing vector with the consequent occurrence of linearization instability. Proper solutions of the linearized equation need to satisfy the Taub constraint on a quadratic combination of first-order variables. We evaluate the Taub constraint in the two available fundamental gauge conditions, and show that in both gauges the $L\geq 1$ modes should accompany the $L=0$ (homogeneous) mode for vanishing sound speed, $c_{s}$. For $c_{s}^{2}>1/5$ (a scalar field supported Einstein static model belongs to this case with $c_s^2 = 1$), the $L\geq 2$ modes are known to be stable. In order to have a stable Einstein static evolutionary stage in the early universe, before inflation and without singularity, although the Taub constraint does not forbid it, we need to find a mechanism to suppress the unstable $L=0$ and $L=1$ modes.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.