Paper detail

Personalized acute stress classification from physiological signals with neural processes

Objective: A person's affective state has known relationships to physiological processes which can be measured by wearable sensors. However, while there are general trends those relationships can be person-specific. This work proposes using neural processes as a way to address individual differences. Methods: Stress classifiers built from classic machine learning models and from neural processes are compared on two datasets using leave-one-participant-out cross-validation. The neural processes models are contextualized on data from a brief period of a particular person's recording. Results: The neural processes models outperformed the standard machine learning models, and had the best performance when using periods of stress and baseline as context. Contextual points chosen from other participants led to lower performance. Conclusion: Neural processes can learn to adapt to person-specific physiological sensor data. There are a wide range of affective and medical applications for which this model could prove useful.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.