Paper detail

Persistent Asymmetric Password-Based Key Exchange

Asymmetric password based key exchange is a key exchange protocol where a client and a server share a low entropic password while the server additionally owns a high entropic secret for a public key. There are simple solutions for this (e.g. Halevi and Krawczyk (ACM TISSEC 1999) and its improvement by Boyarsky (CCS 1999)). In this paper, we consider a new threat to this type of protocol: if a server's high entropic secret gets compromised (e.g., due to cryptanalysis, virus attack or a poor management), the adversary might {\em quickly} break lots of passwords and cause uncountable damage. In this case, one should not expect the protocol to be secure against an off-line dictionary attack since, otherwise, the protocol is in fact a secure password-only key exchange where the server also only has a password (by making the server high entropic secret public). Of course a password-only key exchange does not suffer from this threat as the server does not have a high entropic secret at all. However, known password-only key exchange are not very efficient (note: we only consider protocols without random oracles). This motivates us to study efficient and secure asymmetric password key exchange that avoids the new threat. In this paper, we first provide a formal model for the new threat, where essentially we require that the active adversary can break $\ell$ passwords in $α\ell |{\cal D}|$ steps (for $α<1/2$) only with a probability negligibly close to $\exp(-β\ell)$ for some $β>0$. Then, we construct a framework of asymmetric password based key exchange. We prove that our protocol is secure in the usual sense. We also show that it prevents the new threat. To do this, we introduce a new technique by abstracting a probabilistic experiment from the main proof and providing a neat analysis of it.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.