Paper detail

Persistent and susceptible bacteria with individual deaths

The aim of this paper is to study two models for a bacterial population subject to antibiotic treatments. It is known that some bacteria are sensitive to antibiotics. These bacteria are in a state called persistence and each bacterium can switch from this state to a non-persistent (or susceptible) state and back. Our models extend those introduced in [6] by adding a (random) natural life cycle for each bacterium and by allowing bacteria in the susceptible state to escape the action of the antibiotics with a fixed probability 1-p (while every bacterium in a persistent state survives with probability 1). In the first model we "inject" the antibiotics in the system at fixed, deterministic times while in the second one the time intervals are random. We show that, in order to kill eventually the whole bacterial population, these time intervals cannot be "too large". The maximum admissible length is increasing with respect to p and it decreases rapidly when p<1.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.