Paper detail

Persistence of competing systems of branching random walks

We consider a system of independent branching random walks on $\R$ which start off a Poisson point process with intensity of the form $e_λ(du)=e^{-λu}du$, where $λ\in\R$ is chosen in such a way that the overall intensity of particles is preserved. Denote by $χ$ the cluster distribution and let $ϕ$ be the log-Laplace transform of the intensity of $χ$. If $λϕ'(λ)>0$, we show that the system is persistent (stable) meaning that the point process formed by the particles in the $n$-th generation converges as $n\to\infty$ to a non-trivial point process $Π_{e_λ}^χ$ with intensity $e_λ$. If $λϕ'(λ)<0$, then the branching population suffers local extinction meaning that the limiting point process is empty. We characterize (generally, non-stationary) point processes on $\R$ which are cluster-invariant with respect to the cluster distribution $χ$ as mixtures of the point processes $Π_{ce_λ}^χ$ over $c>0$ and $λ\in K_{\text{st}}$, where $K_{\text{st}}=\{λ\in\R: ϕ(λ)=0, λϕ'(λ)>0\}$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.