Paper detail

Perpetual Codes for Network Coding

Random Linear Network Coding (RLNC) provides a theoretically efficient method for coding. Some of its practical drawbacks are the complexity of decoding and the overhead due to the coding vectors. For computationally weak and battery-driven platforms, these challenges are particular important. In this work, we consider the coding variant Perpetual codes which are sparse, non-uniform and the coding vectors have a compact representation. The sparsity allows for fast encoding and decoding, and the non-uniform protection of symbols enables recoding where the produced symbols are indistinguishable from those encoded at the source. The presented results show that the approach can provide a coding overhead arbitrarily close to that of RLNC, but at reduced computational load. The achieved gain over RLNC grows with the generation size, and both encoding and decoding throughput is approximately one order of magnitude higher compared to RLNC at a generation size of 2048. Additionally, the approach allows for easy adjustment between coding throughput and code overhead, which makes it suitable for a broad range of platforms and applications.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.