Paper detail

Perpendicular Ion Heating by Low-Frequency Alfven-Wave Turbulence in the Solar Wind

We consider ion heating by turbulent Alfven waves (AWs) and kinetic Alfven waves (KAWs) with perpendicular wavelengths comparable to the ion gyroradius and frequencies smaller than the ion cyclotron frequency. When the turbulence amplitude exceeds a certain threshold, an ion's orbit becomes chaotic. The ion then interacts stochastically with the time-varying electrostatic potential, and the ion's energy undergoes a random walk. Using phenomenological arguments, we derive an analytic expression for the rates at which different ion species are heated, which we test by simulating test particles interacting with a spectrum of randomly phased AWs and KAWs. We find that the stochastic heating rate depends sensitively on the quantity epsilon = dv/vperp, where vperp is the component of the ion velocity perpendicular to the background magnetic field B0, and dv (dB) is the rms amplitude of the velocity (magnetic-field) fluctuations at the gyroradius scale. In the case of thermal protons, when epsilon << eps1, where eps1 is a constant, a proton's magnetic moment is nearly conserved and stochastic heating is extremely weak. However, when epsilon > eps1, the proton heating rate exceeds the cascade power that would be present in strong balanced KAW turbulence with the same value of dv, and magnetic-moment conservation is violated. For the random-phase waves in our test-particle simulations, eps1 is approximately 0.2. For protons in low-beta plasmas, epsilon is approximately dB/B0 divided by the square root of beta, and epsilon can exceed eps1 even when dB/B0 << eps1. At comparable temperatures, alpha particles and minor ions have larger values of epsilon than protons and are heated more efficiently as a result. We discuss the implications of our results for ion heating in coronal holes and the solar wind.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.