Paper detail

Permutation polynomials of finite fields

Let $\mathbb{F}_q$ be the finite field of $q$ elements. Then a \emph{permutation polynomial} (PP) of $\mathbb{F}_q$ is a polynomial $f \in \mathbb{F}_q[x]$ such that the associated function $c \mapsto f(c)$ is a permutation of the elements of $\mathbb{F}_q$. In 1897 Dickson gave what he claimed to be a complete list of PPs of degree at most 6, however there have been suggestions recently that this classification might be incomplete. Unfortunately, Dickson's claim of a full characterisation is not easily verified because his published proof is difficult to follow. This is mainly due to antiquated terminology. In this project we present a full reconstruction of the classification of degree 6 PPs, which combined with a recent paper by Li \emph{et al.} finally puts to rest the characterisation problem of PPs of degree up to 6. In addition, we give a survey of the major results on PPs since Dickson's 1897 paper. Particular emphasis is placed on the proof of the so-called \emph{Carlitz Conjecture}, which states that if $q$ is odd and `large' and $n$ is even then there are no PPs of degree $n$. This important result was resolved in the affirmative by research spanning three decades. A generalisation of Carlitz's conjecture due to Mullen proposes that if $q$ is odd and `large' and $n$ is even then no polynomial of degree $n$ is `close' to being a PP. This has remained an unresolved problem in published literature. We provide a counterexample to Mullen's conjecture, and also point out how recent results imply a more general version of this statement (provided one increases what is meant by $q$ being `large').

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.