Paper detail

Periods Detected During Analysis of Radioactivity Measurements Data

Analysis results of data of long-term radioactivity measurements of 3H, 56Mn, 32Si, 36Cl, 60Co, 137Cs, 90Sr-90Y, 226Ra, 238Pu and 239Pu sources are presented. For beta-radioactive sources, their activity in addition to the exponential drop is characterized by rhythmic variations with a period of 1 year and magnitude of 0.1-0.35% from the average value. These oscillations attain maximum values between January and March, with corresponding minimum values occurring from July to September. Spectral analysis of 7-year long measurements of count rates of beta-radioactive sources 90Sr-90Y as well as 15-year long measurements of beta-gamma radiation of 226Ra revealed presence of rhythmic variations with a period of about a month and magnitude 0.01%. Magnitude of diurnal oscillations did not exceed 0.003%. Analysis of measurements data for alpha radioactive sources 238Pu and 239Pu did not reveal any statistically reliable periodic patterns. Possible factors underlying these rhythmic oscillations in beta-radioactivity are discussed.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.