Paper detail

Periodic sequences with stable $k$-error linear complexity

The linear complexity of a sequence has been used as an important measure of keystream strength, hence designing a sequence which possesses high linear complexity and $k$-error linear complexity is a hot topic in cryptography and communication. Niederreiter first noticed many periodic sequences with high $k$-error linear complexity over GF(q). In this paper, the concept of stable $k$-error linear complexity is presented to study sequences with high $k$-error linear complexity. By studying linear complexity of binary sequences with period $2^n$, the method using cube theory to construct sequences with maximum stable $k$-error linear complexity is presented. It is proved that a binary sequence with period $2^n$ can be decomposed into some disjoint cubes. The cube theory is a new tool to study $k$-error linear complexity. Finally, it is proved that the maximum $k$-error linear complexity is $2^n-(2^l-1)$ over all $2^n$-periodic binary sequences, where $2^{l-1}\le k<2^{l}$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.