Paper detail

Period Doubling Renormalization for Area-Preserving Maps and Mild Computer Assistance in Contraction Mapping Principle

It has been observed that the famous Feigenbaum-Coullet-Tresser period doubling universality has a counterpart for area-preserving maps of ${\fR}^2$. A renormalization approach has been used in a "hard" computer-assisted proof of existence of an area-preserving map with orbits of all binary periods in Eckmann et al (1984). As it is the case with all non-trivial universality problems in non-dissipative systems in dimensions more than one, no analytic proof of this period doubling universality exists to date. In this paper we attempt to reduce computer assistance in the argument, and present a mild computer aided proof of the analyticity and compactness of the renormalization operator in a neighborhood of a renormalization fixed point: that is a proof that does not use generalizations of interval arithmetics to functional spaces - but rather relies on interval arithmetics on real numbers only to estimate otherwise explicit expressions. The proof relies on several instance of the Contraction Mapping Principle, which is, again, verified via mild computer assistance.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.