Paper detail

Period Distribution of Inversive Pseudorandom Number Generators Over Galois Rings

In 2009, Solé and Zinoviev (\emph{Eur. J. Combin.}, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 458-467, 2009) proposed an open problem of arithmetic interest to study the period of the inversive pseudorandom number generators (IPRNGs) and to give conditions bearing on $a, b$ to achieve maximal period, we focus on resolving this open problem. In this paper, the period distribution of the IPRNGs over the Galois ring $({\rm Z}_{p^{e}},+,\times)$ is considered, where $p>3$ is a prime and $e\geq 2$ is an integer. The IPRNGs are transformed to 2-dimensional linear feedback shift registers (LFSRs) so that the analysis of the period distribution of the IPRNGs is transformed to the analysis of the period distribution of the LFSRs. Then, by employing some analytical approaches, the full information on the period distribution of the IPRNGs is obtained, which is to make exact statistics about the period of the IPRNGs then count the number of IPRNGs of a specific period when $a$, $b$ and $x_{0}$ traverse all elements in ${\rm Z}_{p^{e}}$. The analysis process also indicates how to choose the parameters and the initial values such that the IPRNGs fit specific periods.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.