Paper detail

Period changes of Mira variables in the M16-M17 region

We analyzed the light curves of 165 AGB variables, mostly Miras, in the sky area centered between M16 and M17 (l=16, b=0), using the OGLE GVS database in the I_C band. Comparison with the published light curves, derived about 50 years earlier by P.~Maffei using Kodak I-N photographic plates, allowed us to find no significant period changes in any star. Remarkably, a few stars of the sample appear to have substantially changed their average luminosity, the most striking case being KZ Ser. We provide a better identification for three stars: IX Ser, NSV 10522, and NSV 10326, all of them being Miras. We classify the light curves of 6 stars, discovered but not classified by Maffei, (GL Ser, NSV 10271, NSV 10326, NSV 10522, NSV 10677, and NSV 10772) five of them being new Miras, and confirm the R CrB nature of V391 Sct. The magnitude scale used by Maffei is compared to the modern I_C one.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.