Paper detail

Perils of Embedding for Quantum Sampling

Given quantum hardware that enables sampling from a family of natively implemented Hamiltonians, how well can one use that hardware to sample from a Hamiltonian outside that family? A common approach is to minor embed the desired Hamiltonian in a native Hamiltonian. In Phys. Rev. Research 2, 023020 (2020) it was shown that minor embedding can be detrimental for classical thermal sampling. Here, we generalize these results by considering quantum thermal sampling in the transverse-field Ising model, i.e. sampling a Hamiltonian with non-zero off diagonal terms. To study these systems numerically we introduce a modification to standard cluster update quantum Monte-Carlo (QMC) techniques, which allows us to much more efficiently obtain thermal samples of an embedded Hamiltonian, enabling us to simulate systems of much larger sizes and larger transverse-field strengths than would otherwise be possible. Our numerics focus on models that can be implemented on current quantum devices using planar two-dimensional lattices, which exhibit finite-temperature quantum phase transitions. Our results include: i) An estimate on the probability to sample the logical subspace directly as a function of transverse-field, temperature, and total system size, which agrees with QMC simulations. ii) We show that typically measured observables (diagonal energy and magnetization) are biased by the embedding process, in the regime of intermediate transverse field strength, meaning that the extracted values are not the same as in the native model. iii) By considering individual embedding realizations akin to 'realizations of disorder', we provide numerical evidence suggesting that as the embedding size is increased, the critical point shifts to increasingly large values of the transverse-field.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.