Paper detail

Performance of W4 theory for spectroscopic constants and electrical properties of small molecules

Accurate spectroscopic constants and electrical properties of small molecules are determined by means of W4 and post-W4 theories. For a set of 28 first- and second-row diatomic molecules for which very accurate experimental spectroscopic constants are available, W4 theory affords near-spectroscopic or better predictions. Specifically, the root-mean-square deviations (RMSD) from experiment are 0.04 pm for the equilibrium bond distances (r_e), 1.03 cm^{-1} for the harmonic frequencies (ω_e), 0.20 cm^{-1} for the first anharmonicity constants (ω_e x_e), 0.10 cm^{-1} for the second anharmonicity constants (ω_e y_e), and 0.001 cm^{-1} for the vibration-rotation coupling constants (α_e). Higher-order connected triples, \hat{T}_3-(T), improve agreement with experiment for the hydride systems, but their inclusion (in the absence of \hat{T}_4) tends to worsen agreement with experiment for the nonhydride systems. Connected quadruple excitations, \hat{T}_4, have significant and systematic effects on r_e, ω_e, and ω_e x_e, in particular they universally increase r_e (by up to 0.5 pm), universally reduce ω_e (by up to 32 cm^{-1}), and universally increase ω_e x_e (by up to 1 cm^{-1}). Connected quintuple excitations, \hat{T}_5, are spectroscopically significant for ω_e of the nonhydride systems, affecting ω_e by up to 4 cm^{-1}. The triatomic molecules H_2O, CO_2, and O_3, as well as the pathologically multireference BN and BeO diatomics, are also considered. The asymmetric stretch of ozone represents a severe challenge to W4 theory, in particular the connected quadruple contribution converges very slowly with the basis set size. Finally, the importance of post-CCSD(T) correlation effects for electrical properties, namely dipole moments (μ), polarizabilities (α), and first hyperpolarizabilities (β) is evaluated.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.