Paper detail

Performance of low vision individuals when selecting a target with head-pointing in virtual reality

Purpose: To investigate psychophysically the ability of low vision individuals with central visual field loss (CFL) to perform a visually-guided pointing task in a virtual reality environment. Methods: Patients with CFL (n=25, ages = 67-90 years) and normally-sighted controls (n=26, ages = 67-85 years) had to select a target (2{\textdegree} diameter dot) with a head-contingent cursor (6{\textdegree} diameter reticle). Target selection occurred when target was validly pointed at for 1.5 seconds. Pointing was valid when target was inside an invisible pointer activation zone (PAZ) centered on reticle. Task difficulty was decreased by increasing PAZ diameter from 0.5{\textdegree} to 8{\textdegree}. Performance was assessed by measuring the time needed to select the target. The task was also performed with an array of three simultaneously-displayed cursors. Results: Selection times decreased (from 14.1 and 8.4 seconds for patients and controls respectively) with increasing PAZ diameter and reached a similar asymptote for both groups (1.4 seconds). The rate of this decrease was smaller for patients so that PAZ diameter needed for their best performance was much larger than PAZ diameter needed for controls' best performance (average: 3.48{\textdegree} vs 1.32{\textdegree}). In the three-reticle condition, both groups tended to use the cursor closer to the target. Conclusions: Patients with CFL are able to point at a 2{\textdegree} target thanks to head-pointing. Their performance can get close to controls' best performance by increasing PAZ size. Translational relevance: This research suggests guidelines to improve the accessibility of visually-guided pointing tools for human-machine interfaces designed for low vision individuals.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.