Paper detail

Performance of eddy-viscosity turbulence models for predicting swirling pipe-flow: Simulations and laser-Doppler velocimetry

We use laser-Doppler velocimetry (LDV) experiments and Reynolds-averaged Navier--Stokes (RANS) simulations to study the characteristic flow patterns downstream of a standardized clockwise swirl disturbance generator. After quantifying the impact of the mesh size, we evaluate the potential of various eddy-viscosity turbulence models in providing reasonable approximations with respect to the experimental reference. The choice of turbulent models reflects current industry practice. Our results suggest that models from the $k$-$ε$ family are more accurate in predicting swirling flows than models from the $k$-$ω$ family. For sufficiently resolved meshes, the realizable $k$-$ε$ model provides the most accurate approximation of the velocity magnitudes, although it fails to capture small-scale flow structures which are accurately predicted by the standard $k$-$ε$ model and the RNG $k$-$ε$ model. Throughout the article, we highlight practical guidance for the choice of RANS turbulence models for swirling flow.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.